Since we are approaching the one year anniversary of “random” drug testing in Crivitz Penitentiary–aka Crivitz High, I thought it was time to revisit this most unpopular policy. An article on line said that the policy was voted in unanimously, which many seem to be here locally. I had recently seen a poll where 81% were not in favor of this policy. It’s hard to fathom a board that just does not seem to listen to their own district constituents. The 4th Amendment to the Constitution is being ignored here in Crivitz. In the 4th it allows: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things … This was passed in 1789, but apparently the good folks on the board, the administrator, and the Athletic Director don’t need the Constitution.

As I read the hundreds of comments on the internet, I could not find one in support of the policy. Even other administrators of schools chimed in. An interview in the Marshfield News Herald had this comment: “I don’t think this drug use surprises anyone,” Blair said. “There are students taking drugs. In the schools, we’re trying to educate, enlighten students, but the bottom line is we aren’t the parents. The key to this is the involvement of parents.” Michael Blair, athletic director at the Stevens Point Area Public School District. Another viewpoint: “Before we would go to something like (random testing), we would need to have a very valid reason for it,” said Thom Hahn, director of secondary education in the Wausau School District. Not the parents? Having a valid reason to do something? Are you listening Crivitz School officials?
Even is you are someone in favor of this policy the Washington Post had this to say: A 2013 study looked at 14 years of data on student drug use and found that school drug testing was associated with “moderately lower marijuana use,” but increased use of other, more dangerous illicit drugs.
A 2014 study concluded that drug testing was “was not associated with changes in substance use.”
A 2013 study comparing drug use rates among schools with and without drug testing programs found some short-term deterrent effect among students who were tested, but no effects among students who weren’t tested, and no long-term effects on either drug use or intention to use drugs in the future. Hmm, no long-term effects on drug use?? Since the Constitution, public opinion, and their own policies don’t seem to have an impact on school policy in Crivitz, I wonder what other loopholes they are utilizing. Stay tuned.

